A man who spent 26 years in solitary confinement in Pennsylvania prisons has been given the go-ahead to sue the state by a US appeals court. The court ruling allows the man to move forward with his lawsuit accusing the state of cruel and unusual punishment for his extended period of isolation.
The case centers around Arthur Johnson, who was placed in solitary confinement in 1979 for allegedly organizing a fight in the prison yard. Johnson remained in solitary confinement for the next 26 years, until his release in 2005. During his time in isolation, Johnson was confined to a small cell for 23 hours a day, with limited access to natural light or human contact.
Johnson’s lawsuit alleges that Pennsylvania violated his constitutional rights by subjecting him to inhumane conditions in solitary confinement for such an extended period of time. The appeals court’s ruling overturns a previous decision that dismissed Johnson’s lawsuit, allowing him to proceed with his legal claims against the state.
Solitary confinement has long been a controversial practice in the US prison system, with critics arguing that it can have serious psychological effects on inmates. Johnson’s case brings attention to the issue of long-term solitary confinement and raises questions about the treatment of prisoners in the state of Pennsylvania.
The decision by the appeals court to allow Johnson to sue Pennsylvania over his 26 years of solitary confinement is a significant development in the ongoing debate over the use of isolation in prisons. It remains to be seen how the case will unfold, but it has already drawn attention to the need for reform in the treatment of inmates in the US criminal justice system.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com