Damon Landor, a Rastafarian inmate in Louisiana, had his knee-length dreadlocks forcibly shaved off by prison officials in 2020, despite their religious significance. The Supreme Court may now decide if inmates, like Landor, can sue officials for violating their religious rights under a 2000 law. Despite Louisiana amending its grooming policy, they argue that correction officials cannot be held liable for violating Landor’s rights. Thirty faith organizations back Landor’s appeal claiming that damages are essential in holding prison officials accountable for religious rights violations. The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act was passed to prevent such restrictions, but two decades later, some institutions continue to burden inmates without necessity. Muslim inmates, in particular, face challenges in practicing their faith in state prisons around the country. The Supreme Court previously allowed Muslim men to sue FBI agents for religious rights violations, but now must decide whether to review Louisiana’s rejection of Landor’s claim for damages. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and Louisiana officials believe the issue of damages is not crucial, as it could lead to worsened prison conditions and staffing problems. Landor’s lawyers argue that without effective relief, inmates like Landor risk further violations of their religious rights despite policy changes.
Photo credit
www.usatoday.com
Rastafarian seeks permission from Supreme Court to file lawsuit against hair discrimination due to shaved dreadlocks
